Ancient Lead Codices
from Saudi Arabia

Lead is the principle byproduct of refining silver, and besides featuring coin stamps these codices are (in the special case of the most recent find in Saudi Arabia) also found with associated coins, most outside the norms of numismatists. The iconography of these coins and the texts are both known conventions as well as unique, being early Judaica in symbols and Judaean script with some Paleohebrew. Yet the bulk of text is a middle Aramaic between Palmyrene and Nabataean (the other 22 character scripts) having numeral signs, featuring ligatures (tied-letters), and utilizing archaic forms like bowed inverted or reversed letters. A limited amount of Greek can also be found, seemingly used for ornamental purposes. Palmyrene was a dialect of Aramaic that was spoken in Palmyra and other parts of the ancient Near East. It was similar enough to Hebrew that native Hebrew speakers would have understood the dialect to a certain extent. The two languages share a similar vocabulary and grammar, and many Palmyrene words are cognate with Hebrew words. As a result, a native Hebrew speaker would have been able to understand much of what was said in Palmyrene, even if they did not speak it fluently.

These codices, which exhibit Hebraic-Israelite and Judaean characteristics in their iconography, language, and idioms, don’t lend themselves to straightforward translation. Given their archaic and broad expression – typical of rock inscriptions – they necessitate a profound understanding of ancient linguistic roots. In fact, to truly decode their messages, one needs the metaphorical “little book in the hand of the angel,” which refers to a guide detailing the meanings of the 22 letters of the ancient Hebrew alphabet and the 22 two-letter root words. Even then, interpretation of each saying is necessary to fully comprehend their intended messages.

 

These lead codices seem not to have been designed for readability, as many of their contents are illegible – a feature that’s unrelated to their age, since lead doesn’t corrode. The hypothesis is that these artefacts were perhaps intended more for promotional or rallying purposes, targeting a largely illiterate audience. Therefore, their aesthetic appeal might have been of greater significance than the comprehensibility of the text inscribed, however extensive it might be.

Despite this, one can discern certain words, statements, and even corrections, which shed light on their illustrations and provide decipherable sayings. The same peculiarities in letter positioning observed in these writings are often found on Judaean coins, especially those from the Maccabean/Hasmonean and Bar Kokhba eras.

However, the enigmatic nature of these booklets suggests they may have been intentionally cryptic in design. A verse from the book of 4 Ezra 14:42–46 hints at this possibility, as it describes how the Most High endowed five men with the understanding to transcribe unfamiliar characters. Over forty days, they wrote ninety-four books during the day and sustained themselves with bread at night. The Most High then instructed the distribution of the first twenty-four books among both the deserving and undeserving, but reserved the last seventy for the wise.

 

Second Temple (via) Wikimedia Commons
  • Note: The book of 4 Ezra (also known as 2 Esdras), an Old Testament whose canonicity is debated, but it was popular in the early church and cited by Church Fathers. The Latin version included Christian material in the first two and last two chapters, which interpret apocalyptic prophecies about the destruction of the Jerusalem temple, the judgment of Judea, and the calling of the Gentiles. The main text (chapters 3-14 in Latin, 1-12 in eastern editions) likely originated in the 1st century AD and centers around Ezra receiving revelatory visions in the 5th century BC.